On account of the constitutional doctrine commonly called “separation of church and state,” governmental courts, except in instances of sexual abuse, generally refuse to entertain legal claims against church leaders on account of incompetence or unfitness to lead. The only recourse available for malpractice by church leaders is to walk away from the church they lead and search for a church or community of believers led by leaders truly competent and fit of mind and heart to preach, teach and provide pastoral care on God’s terms. As a follower of Jesus, I write here of the body of believers commonly grouped under the heading “Christians” and include the Catholic Church and all forms of religion that identify Jesus as Lord and Savior. Of other paths of faith, I will not write, leaving it to followers of those paths to comment on their leadership’s competence and qualifications for office.
How is a leader in a Christian organization held accountable for being incompetent or unfit to serve as a leader? Sure, ultimately he or she is accountable to God for failing to lead according to God’s terms. But meanwhile much harm (for example, neglect of vigorous spiritual growth if nothing else) is inflicted and tolerated in the name of Jesus and in the end all is forgiven anyways. Is there truly any harm in being a bungling preacher, teacher and pastor who makes a living at that role while failing his or her unwary flock? Under the teachings of Jesus about forgiveness, is not all harm wiped away in the end? Do we safely shrug off incompetence and unfitness among clergy as trivial? Perhaps it is the complacency of church members towards the incompetence and unfitness of clergy that causes the Church as a whole to have fallen into disrepute in society’s eyes. Neglect of Jesus’ call upon us all infects the whole Church.
These are issues I ask you to struggle with. How do you know if your church leaders are competent and fit to speak for God as Jesus spoke for God? I suggest it is the responsibility and power of every church member who follows Jesus as Lord and Savior to master the art of listening to the Holy Spirit as the Voice of God in his or her life. And if the Holy Spirit disagrees with the church leader, that’s a sign of incompetence and unfitness to lead. Within the Body of Christ, the Holy Spirit is the Voice of Truth that Jesus sent us to hear and heed. He did not promise to send us preachers and teachers to lead us into all truth. He promised to send us the Holy Spirit. If we do not yet know how to hear the Spirit’s Voice, we need first and foremost to learn that art. How can we heed a Voice do not know how to hear? Has it become all too easy and convenient to settle for listening to well-or-poorly-crafted, artfully-or-less-artfully presented sermons on Sunday instead of learning to listen to God intently throughout every minute of every day?
I suggest that a church leader who does not know how to hear and heed the Spirit’s Voice is unqualified to lead. He or she should step down from positions of leadership, confess his or her failure to master the art of hearing and heeding and take up a position in a pew other than the front row to reflect in humility upon the error of claiming to lead when unqualified to lead. That a man or woman knows how to read a printed text and study study-guides wherein human “experts” purport to tell him or her what the text means does not qualify that person to speak for Jesus or for God. It merely qualifies him or her to be a parrot, not a spokesperson for God. Many a religious leader in Jesus’ days on Earth had the capacity to read, parrot back and therefore claim to lead. Jesus used harsh words to describe those supposed leaders in their failure to hear and heed the Spirit’s Voice. He called them hypocrites and other clearly unflattering terms.
When will followers of Jesus within institutions of religion claiming to be Christian stop allowing seminary training to be the qualifying mark of leadership within the Body of Christ? When will an education provided by mankind stop being accepted as sufficient to qualify a man or woman to lead a community of God’s people? Until we demand that our leaders not only be called by the Spirit to lead but also qualified by the Spirit to lead, we’ll suffer from a Church corrupted and compromised by the politics of social niceness.
Just when we most need men and women who put their minds upon the things of God and not upon the things of humankind, we, the Christian Church, have conformed to the world by accepting educational certifications issued by human religious organizations as proof of a person’s qualifications to speak for Jesus. We have rendered unto Caesar what is God’s by surrendering the Body of Christ to the holders of diplomas who do not hear and heed the One whom Jesus sent to lead us into all truth. We who sit in pews listening and sensing that something is missing within our church need to take responsibility for the ones we call “leaders” and either remove them from leadership or vigorously support their acquisition of greater mastery of the art of hearing and heeding the Spirit. We can no longer sit complacently in our pews and allow those who speak before our congregations to commit malpractice unchallenged. If the courts of law will not grant us redress, then we need to stand up for Jesus on our own and trust in the Lord to grant us redress. If we do not stand up for Jesus when our leaders fail to stand with and for him, who will?
We have learned so well to feel powerless and follow like sheep to the slaughter that we hesitate to rock the boat and call out incompetence and unfitness among church leaders when we sense it is present. Among the flock are ones who know better than to sit silently while church leaders pretend to know the full truth of God and fail to disclose its most challenging aspects. The church is too often led by men and women who carefully censor and dilute their teachings to make sure that those sitting in the pews continue to put money in the offering plate and support the church financially – all so the Church’s budgets will be met, including the salaries of the very leaders who fail the Church. The cyclical Catch-22 of social approval operates to confine the Body of Believers to the comfort zones defined by clergy who have succeeded in charming the religious leaders who have gone before them out of credentials that qualify the new generation of leaders to follow not in the footsteps of Jesus but in the footsteps of the church leaders who have betrayed Jesus before them. If current leaders make sure to grant credentials only to those who will not later expose their earlier reigns of incompetence, no leader will speak up. The conspiracy of clerical silence insures continuation of the cycle of incompetence unless the laity speaks up.
Will we, the People of the Body of Christ, sit idly by while church leaders defile the Church, distort Jesus’ teachings into self-serving doctrines and otherwise commit spiritual malpractice right before our eyes – just so we can huddle in our respective comfort zones in complacent silence? If we see with our hearts, we will see what the Holy Spirit is showing us and we’ll not sit still while being asked to follow falsely. We cannot expect government regulators to rescue us from our own complacency. We must rebel from within the Church against smug clerical incompetence and break up the cozy clubs by which the clergy control the Church and convert the high calling of Christ into a den of thieves. It is theft for incompetent clergy to accept salaries and other remuneration while failing to provide leadership commensurate with Jesus’ standards. Will we allow ourselves to be victims of theft simply because we too crave social approval and don’t want to risk the vulnerability required of those who blow the whistle?
Are there any among those who read what I write here who dare to speak up, pro or con?
© Art Nicol 2016